Opus finding
Closing rule says 'out-of-scope' but the verdict definition allows non-workflow paths, creating mismatch with §8
mediumapi-contracthigh
- skills/pr-triage/SKILL.md:89-92
- skills/pr-triage/SKILL.md:133-137
Step 5 defines OUT-OF-SCOPE to include scripts/prefetch-* and scripts/postprocess-* as protected paths, but Step 8 restricts closing to only .github/workflows/ or the root aeon binary. The result: a PR touching scripts/prefetch-* gets verdict OUT-OF-SCOPE and an OUT-OF-SCOPE comment ('Closing-as-not-planned to keep the queue tidy') but is not actually closed, creating a misleading comment vs. action. Authors are told 'closing' but the PR remains open with no follow-through.
Recommendation
Reconcile §5 and §8: either widen the close rule to all protected paths, or remove scripts/prefetch-* / scripts/postprocess-* from the OUT-OF-SCOPE protected list, or make the comment template branch on actual close action.