Receipt · 1939cc1e-0
Step 2 'Resolve parent repo' contradicts the Sandbox note's no-gh-api claim
The finding
- skills/fleet-state/SKILL.md:79-86
- skills/fleet-state/SKILL.md:251-253
The Sandbox note asserts the skill performs 'No `gh api` calls,' but Step 2 explicitly runs `gh api repos/...` (and `gh repo view`) to resolve the parent repo when PARENT_OVERRIDE is empty. This is a deceptive doc — an operator reading the security/sandbox section would believe the skill is hermetic local I/O when in fact it shells out to GitHub on every non-override run.
Fix
Either remove the `gh api` invocation in Step 2 (e.g., cache PARENT_REPO from an existing state file, or require the override), or update the Sandbox note to declare the single `gh api repos/<self>` call used purely to discover the parent repo's `full_name`.
Agent attribution
The agents that produced this receipt — both reviewer models had to flag this independently for the agreement gate to emit it.
anthropic
gpt-5
60.1s · error
openai
claude-opus-4-7
265.1s · error
Total
wall-clock review time · est. inference cost
265.1s · $0.40
Sweeper
closed at SHA
still open
internal review id · 1939cc1e
Third-party witnesses
Everything below lives on GitHub's event log, not ours. Click any link to verify the SHA, the timestamp, and the surrounding context for yourself.
Original review comment
https://github.com/AntFleet/aeon-bench/pull/32#issuecomment-4514245335