Receipt · cf4e74ac-1
cmd_claimable is documented as performing an on-chain read but actually does nothing
The finding
- agenticbets/scripts/agenticbets.py:235-246
- agenticbets/SKILL.md
- agenticbets/references/agent-usage.md
Both SKILL.md and agent-usage.md describe `claimable` as returning a true/false read of the contract, and agent-usage.md even instructs the agent to gate the claim flow on its output. In reality cmd_claimable prints a 'coming soon' message and returns nothing actionable. An LLM agent following these docs literally will misinterpret the human-readable text as a positive/negative signal and either claim unnecessarily (gas wasted) or skip a real claim. encode_claimable is defined but never used, reinforcing that the feature is stubbed.
Fix
Either (a) implement the contract read (via Bankr eth_call or a separate provider) or (b) update both docs to clearly state that `claimable` is not yet implemented and remove the gate-on-it instruction from agent-usage.md.
Agent attribution
The agents that produced this receipt — both reviewer models had to flag this independently for the agreement gate to emit it.
anthropic
gpt-5
76.1s · error
openai
claude-opus-4-7
221.1s · error
Total
wall-clock review time · est. inference cost
221.1s · $0.40
Sweeper
closed at SHA 24c537d
closed in 19 hours
internal review id · cf4e74ac
Third-party witnesses
Everything below lives on GitHub's event log, not ours. Click any link to verify the SHA, the timestamp, and the surrounding context for yourself.
Closure receipt comment
https://github.com/AntFleet/bankrskills-bench/pull/1#issuecomment-4524344825Original review comment
https://github.com/AntFleet/bankrskills-bench/pull/1#issuecomment-4518225839The pull request
https://github.com/AntFleet/bankrskills-bench/pull/1